The following report has been presented without any significant editing. I find it very much to MY Taste. I liked the report for its unconventional approach to the entire THING. I thought that you ALL would enjoy to some extent - if not entirely. And Oh yes - this is just the 1st part. Hope to receive more from her.
The
book starts off with the same charm that it could strongly retain throughout.
If one wasn't informed that this was a philosophy book, it'd have felt just
like reading a down-to-earth story about the slow-paced, mysterious life of
Sophie Amundsen. The writer efficiently paved the path towards an actual
fact-based philosophy lesson.
Once a
topic was disclosed, it was very hard to stop reading, mainly because something
dormant in my mind was forced to stir up and question itself, and everything
around it. From the beginning of the human race we were born with intuition.
Somehow midst the transparent habits that society induced us with (thank you
Sophists!), it seems that intuition can in those unfortunate cases, be
buried.
The
most confusing thing that I came across in this book was: upon understanding
the different ways with which these philosophers tried to figure out this
world, each and every one of them seemed to make sense, and I found myself
nodding in humble agreement. Yet, as the writer was done talking about one, he
immediately brought about another concept to shatter the previous one. For
instance, when Plato believed that everything has an universal 'form' that was
unchangeable and perfect in its flow and which everything we saw, followed (Hence
horses are horses and humans are humans (rather than hu-rses)); in trots Aristotle,
flipping the concept on its head and expressing that maybe everything that
exists, exists in different categories, from which they acquire
that 'form'. It's confusing because they seem so right in the beginning!
I made
sure that I thought independently over the initial questions that came before
each lesson, and some that baffled me were: "Do you believe in Fate?"
- (To an extent.. but then what happens of free will? Or is it an illusion?). "Is
sickness the punishment of the gods?" (If we were intervened by divine
power in this life, then what of its purpose? So, no? But what of “karma”
then?!) "Decide whether you think that man has an eternal soul."-
(not a question, but.. if everything takes on a specific immutable 'form' or a
'form' dictates the creation of a flow of everything, isn't the soul a subject
to it? Or are we just referring to this mystery as a 'soul' because some
logical-biological explanation hasn't crossed our minds yet? But (!) eternal
bliss sounds so irresistible, the soul has to be immortal.)
The
pace of the book is very comforting. It's helpful to have almost all the
difficult concepts take different forms in terms of numerous examples and
allowing the time for the information to seep in and be engraved onto the
brain. Each time that the author touches upon the story of a great
philosopher's life, consciousness feels elevated and the presumed convictions I
had seem to be slightly shaken. (No immortal soul? What is an
immortal soul?) There's also great diversity in the book that fascinated
me, it only depended on the way you looked at it. It can easily be a history
book with the accounts of Alexander the Great, the birth of Christianity, the
long chain of great men that emerged from the line of Socrates himself. It can
be a book for the peace and affirmation of the soul, or the denunciation of
one. It can be a passionate book on Sophie's little mysteries or the fluttering
life of a teenager.
If one
observed closely, this book was so carefully written that a firm bridge between
the world of philosophy and the world of science can be drawn. From the element
theories of Parminedes or Empedocles to the atom theory of Democritus, it
seemed, if not from anywhere else, they paved the way towards those great
discoveries Man has been making now, while denouncing some philosophers as
unimportant. Yet (!), their passion rests on the same pillow.
P. S.
The
first thing about this book that made me almost empathize with the excitement
of a toddler was when my assumptions chanced on this: "philoSOPHY'S
world" (?)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments may be moderated by Shahidul Mamun before publishing.